Abstract
The article presents the results of the research project, part of the research group “Sphere of the public and citizen participation”, in the research line “Training in Ethics and Politics”. There are presented the definitions of the basic categories of analysis, the methodological process of gathering information through analysis matrices and, finally, the results obtained. The focus of this article is to present the analysis and discussion of the results achieved, and therefore the approach to social representations that the students of the Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores have developed about the public. The study was based on the selection and order made by students of provided images, which are related to certain elements of the public determined with the above categories, around hypothetical matrix raised for research: on which are the places where the public relations can be located preferentially; if this is the constituent (is built?) or is made (is learned?); and on the relational aspect of the public: is interaction, roles or codes? In two areas: languages (verbal, iconic, body) and values. It is found that the social representation that students have built about public consists of leaders clearly identifiable by their social roles and functions related to political activism as spatially located in places of gratuity and freedom, whose purpose is the common good, in which the expected sense is of safety and protection. Despite this positive view of the public, the attitude on occupy a political and active role is reluctant and negative, which is analyzed as detrimental to the role and status of the student as a political and critical actor in the development and construction of community and society.
References
Bauman, z. (2003). Modernidad liquida. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
García, F., Martínez, K., Moreno, A. & Armenta, A. (2010). Un aparato teórico para el análisis de las representaciones de lo público en jóvenes universitarios. Revista Civilizar, enero-junio de 2010 (Nº 19), pp. 119-134.
García, F., Martínez, K., Moreno, A. & Armenta, A. (2010). Representaciones sociales de lo público en estudiantes de la Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores. Génesis y desarrollo de un proyecto de investigación, Revista Perfiles Libertadores, 2011 (Nº 7).
Gerhards, J. y Neidhardt, F. (1991). Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen und Ansätze. En Stefan Müller-Doohm & Klaus Neumann-Braun (Edits.), Öffentlichkeit, Kultur, Massenkommunikation: Bei-träge zur Medien und Kommunikationssoziologie. Oldenburg: Universitätsverlag.
Habermas, J. (1998). Facticidad y validez. Madrid: Trotta.
Habermas, J. (1984). Historia y crítica de la opinión pública. La transformación estructural de la vida pública. México y Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2006). Multitud. Guerra y Democracia en la era del Imperio. Barcelona: Debolsillo.
Keane, J. (1995). Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. The Communication Review, vol.1 (Nº1), pp. 1-22.
Maffesoli, M. (2004). El tiempo de las tribus. México: Siglo XXI.
Mouffe, Ch. (2002). Which Public Sphere for a Democratic Society? Theoria, vol. 49 (Nº 99), pp. 55-65.
Mouffe, Ch. (2000). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. Viena: Institute for Advanced Studies.
Plessner, H. (1960). Das Problem der Öffentlichkeit und die Idee der Entfremdung. Göttingen: Göttinger Universitätsreden.
Plessner, H. (2001). Grenzen der Gemeinschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Sennett, R. (1978). El declive del hombre público. Barcelona: Península.
Virno, P. (2000). Gramática de la Multitud. Para un análisis de las formas de vida contemporánea. Argentina: Ediciones Colihue.
This work is licensed under a Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-