Repensando la estatalidad: la hibridez y el modelo de contra-fragilidad de la OCDE a partir de la experiencia de Sudán del Sur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37511/viaiuris.n39a3Palabras clave:
Fragilidad estatal, contra-fragilidad, Estado, OCDE, hibridez, Sudán del SurResumen
Esta investigación analiza el modelo de contra-fragilidad estatal de la OCDE y su relación con los conceptos de hibridización entre 2006 y 2025, periodo de actualización del marco para abordar la fragilidad. Se emplea un análisis documental y comparativo de carácter cualitativo, centrado en los cambios discursivos y conceptuales en documentos oficiales de la OCDE y su contraste con la experiencia de los donantes internacionales en Sudán del Sur. La selección de este caso responde a su condición de país crónicamente frágil y a su reciente interpretación desde la hibridez, lo que lo convierte en un escenario idóneo para evaluar la aplicabilidad del modelo. Los hallazgos muestran que, aunque el modelo incorpora ciertos avances, la OCDE adopta la hibridez de forma más explicativa que operativa, orientada a la construcción de estatalidad convencional, lo que limita su capacidad para enfrentar la complejidad de contextos frágiles como el sursudanés.Descargas
Referencias
Abbott, K. W., y Faude, B. (2022). Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance. Review of International Organizations, 17(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09431-3
Bargués-Pedreny, P., y Randazzo, E. (2018). Hybrid peace revisited: An opportunity for considering self-governance? Third World Quarterly, 39(8), 1543–1560. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1447849
Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., y Nolan, A. (2008). On hybrid political orders and emerging states: State formation in the context of fragility. Berghof Handbook Dialogue, 8, 1–21. https://berghof-foundation.org/files/publications/dialogue8_boegeetal_lead.pdf
Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., y Nolan, A. (2010). Gobernanza y ciudadanía en los órdenes políticos híbridos: Un cambio de perspectiva en la noción de “construcción del Estado”. Anuario CEIPAZ, 3, 63–81. https://ceipaz.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Boege-Brown-etal.pdf
Boege, V., Brown, M. A., y Clements, K. P. (2009). Hybrid political orders, not fragile states. Peace Review, 21(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650802689997
Bornemisza, O., Ranson, M. K., Poletti, T. M., y Sondorp, E. (2010). Promoting health equity in conflict-affected fragile states. Social Science & Medicine, 70(1), 80–88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953609006236
Cammack, D., McLeod, D., Rocha Menocal, A., y Christiansen, K. (2006). Donors and the “fragile states” agenda: A survey of current thinking and practice. Overseas Development Institute. https://inee.org/sites/default/files/resources/doc_1_Cammack-Donors_and_fs_agenda.pdf
Department for International Development [DFID]. (2005). Reducing poverty by tackling social exclusion: A DFID policy paper. DFID. https://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/development/docs/socialexclusion.pdf
European Communities. (2009). Overcoming fragility in Africa: Forging a new European approach. Mobilising European research for development policies (European Report on Development 2009). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute. https://kpsrl.org/sites/kpsrl/files/publications/files/erd_report_en.pdf
Fallers, L. (2011). The social anthropology of the nation-state. Routledge.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Cornell University Press.
Helman, G. B., y Ratner, S. R. (1992). Saving failed states. Foreign Policy, 89, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149070
Hutnyk, J. (2005). Hybridity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280021
Jackson, P., y Albrecht, P. (2018). Power, politics and hybridity. En J. Wallis, L. Kent, M. Forsyth, S. Dinnen, y S. Bose (Eds.), Hybridity on the ground in peacebuilding and development: Critical conversations (pp. 37–50). ANU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvgd1g9
Krasner, S. D., y Pascual, C. (2005). Addressing state failure. Foreign Affairs, 84(4), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/20034427
Leimgruber, M., y Schmelzer, M. (2017). From the Marshall Plan to global governance: Historical transformations of the OEEC/OECD, 1948 to present. En M. Leimgruber y M. Schmelzer (Eds.), The OECD and the international political economy since 1948 (pp. xx–xx). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60243-1_2
Leimgruber, M., y Schmelzer, M. (2017). Introduction: Writing histories of the OECD. En M. Leimgruber y M. Schmelzer (Eds.), The OECD and the international political economy since 1948 (pp. xx–xx). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60243-1_1
López Martín, A. G. (2011). Los Estados “fallidos” y sus implicaciones en el ordenamiento jurídico internacional. Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/45298
Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610374312
Martens, K., y Jakobi, A. P. (2010). Mechanisms of OECD governance: International incentives for national policy-making. Oxford University Press. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591145.001.0001/acprof-9780199591145
Meagher, K., De Herdt, T., y Titeca, K. (2014). Unravelling public authority: Paths of hybrid governance in Africa. IS Academy, 10, 1–8. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-5863789
Menkhaus, K. (2006). Governance without government in Somalia: Spoilers, state building, and the politics of coping. International Security, 31(3), 74–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137508
Moran, D., y Batley, R. (2004). Literature review of non-state provision of basic services. International Development Department, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham.
Nay, O. (2014). International organizations and the production of hegemonic knowledge: How the World Bank and the OECD helped invent the fragile state concept. Third World Quarterly, 35(2), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.878128
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2006). Synthesis paper on good practice: The challenge for donors (Fragile States Group, Work Stream on Service Delivery, draft paper). OECD.
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2007). Fragile states: Policy commitment and principles for good international engagement in fragile states and situations. OECD Publishing. https://one.oecd.org/document/DCD/DAC(2007)29/en/pdf
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2009). Service delivery in fragile situations: Key concepts, findings and lessons. OECD Journal on Development, 9(3), 7–60. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2009/04/oecd-journal-on-development-volume-9-issue-3_g1gh8ab5/journal_dev-v9-3-en.pdf
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2010). The state's legitimacy in fragile situations: Unpacking complexity, conflict and fragility. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264083882-en
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2011). 2011 report on international engagement in fragile states: Republic of South Sudan. https://csrf-southsudan.org/repository/2011-report-international-engagement-fragile-states-republic-south-sudan/
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2011). Supporting statebuilding in situations of conflict and fragility: Policy guidance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264074989-en
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2016). States of fragility 2016: Understanding violence. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267213-en
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2023). Co-ordination across the humanitarian-development-peace nexus. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/co-ordination-across-the-humanitarian-development-peace-nexus_fd302760-en.html
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2025a). Engaging in contexts facing highest fragility. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/development-co-operation-tips-tools-insights-practices_be69e0cf-en/engaging-in-fragile-contexts_b67a279f-en.html
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico [OCDE]. (2025b). States of fragility 2025. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/states-of-fragility-2025_81982370-en.html
Richardson, H. J. (2008). Failed states, self-determination, and preventive diplomacy: Colonialist nostalgia and democratic expectations. Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 10, 1–78. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1291912
Rolandsen, Ø. H. (2019). Trade, peace-building and hybrid governance in the Sudan–South Sudan borderlands. Conflict, Security & Development, 19(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1561628
Truppa, C., Yaacoub, S., Valente, M., Celentano, G., Ragazzoni, L., y Saulnier, D. (2024). Health systems resilience in fragile and conflict-affected settings: A systematic scoping review. Conflict and Health, 18(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-023-00560-7
Twijnstra, R., y Titeca, K. (2016). Everything changes to remain the same? State and tax reform in South Sudan. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(2), 263–292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26309867
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Revista Vía Iuris
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
.png){kind=logo}
